For shoe factories, choosing a reasonable sole pressing machine is the key to ensuring production efficiency and product quality. The following are the key points for you to choose from multiple dimensions.

Suitable for production scale: The production scale determines the type and capacity of the sole pressing machine. Small shoe factories have low monthly output and flexible orders. Single-head pneumatic and hydraulic sole pressing machines have low costs and small footprints, which can meet the needs of small-batch production. As the order volume of large shoe factories increases, double-station sole pressing machines can meet the needs of high output. They have a high degree of automation and can produce thousands of pairs of shoes per day, which is suitable for large-scale assembly line production.

Shoe factories have a variety of product types, and the sole pressing machine needs to be compatible. Different shoe styles have different requirements for pressing angles and strengths. For example, sports shoes need to strengthen the heel and side pressing, while leather shoes focus on overall flatness. At the same time, the materials of the soles vary greatly. Rubber soles require high pressure, while EVA soles require gentle pressing. Select adjustable parameters.

Ensure the quality of pressing: The quality of pressing directly affects the service life of the shoes. A reasonable pressing machine should have a stable and accurate pressure control system with a pressure error of no more than ±2%. The full hydraulic system pressing machine has high and uniform pressure, and with multiple closely spaced hydraulic cylinders, it can fit the complex contours of the shoe edge, making the sole and the upper tightly combined, reducing the risk of debonding. In addition, the pressing time also needs to be precisely controlled to avoid overpressure or underpressure. ​

Consider both cost and service: Comprehensive cost is as important as after-sales service. In terms of energy consumption, energy-saving equipment should be given priority, as long-term use can significantly reduce electricity costs. In terms of procurement costs, budget and equipment performance should be considered to avoid blindly pursuing high-end products. At the same time, manufacturers with fast after-sales response and sufficient spare parts supply should be selected to ensure timely repairs when equipment fails, thus reducing production stoppage losses.